<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Luddites?&#8221; How About &#8220;Regular People&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.usabilityblog.com/2008/12/luddites-how-about-regular-people/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2008/12/luddites-how-about-regular-people/</link>
	<description>Blogging about usability, user experience and design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:40:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2008/12/luddites-how-about-regular-people/comment-page-1/#comment-8229</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 18:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usabilityblog.com/index.php/2008/12/04/luddites-how-about-regular-people/#comment-8229</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m teaching myself guitar...slowly. I don&#039;t complain that it&#039;s hard, or that it takes lots of study and practice. That&#039;s the cost of being able to wield an axe. In the same way, taking some time to learn Wikicode and the rules of Wikipedia is the cost of being a contributor to the best information source in existence.

Usability convention may say we should fight for the easiest way, and that&#039;s true, but eventually a corollary will be added: some barriers to entry are important to keep features strong and quality high.

In this case, the complaint has nothing to do with the &#039;usability&#039; of Wikipedia&#039;s editing interface, and everything to do with people who:
 - don&#039;t understand why they should have to learn wikicode or why there are conventions to Wikipedia article editing
 - don&#039;t want to learn the code/conventions</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m teaching myself guitar&#8230;slowly. I don&#8217;t complain that it&#8217;s hard, or that it takes lots of study and practice. That&#8217;s the cost of being able to wield an axe. In the same way, taking some time to learn Wikicode and the rules of Wikipedia is the cost of being a contributor to the best information source in existence.</p>
<p>Usability convention may say we should fight for the easiest way, and that&#8217;s true, but eventually a corollary will be added: some barriers to entry are important to keep features strong and quality high.</p>
<p>In this case, the complaint has nothing to do with the &#8216;usability&#8217; of Wikipedia&#8217;s editing interface, and everything to do with people who:<br />
 &#8211; don&#8217;t understand why they should have to learn wikicode or why there are conventions to Wikipedia article editing<br />
 &#8211; don&#8217;t want to learn the code/conventions</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

