<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ling&#8217;s Cars: It Works</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.usabilityblog.com/2010/02/lings-cars-it-works/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2010/02/lings-cars-it-works/</link>
	<description>Blogging about usability, user experience and design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:40:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Imranomahic_2010</title>
		<link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2010/02/lings-cars-it-works/comment-page-1/#comment-10289</link>
		<dc:creator>Imranomahic_2010</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 23:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usabilityblog.com/2010/02/lings-cars-it-works/#comment-10289</guid>
		<description>Isaac and harry were on this website.  Summerland is awesome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isaac and harry were on this website.  Summerland is awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Imranomahic_2010</title>
		<link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2010/02/lings-cars-it-works/comment-page-1/#comment-10288</link>
		<dc:creator>Imranomahic_2010</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 23:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usabilityblog.com/2010/02/lings-cars-it-works/#comment-10288</guid>
		<description>summerland  rocks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>summerland  rocks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: www.centralcontracts.com</title>
		<link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2010/02/lings-cars-it-works/comment-page-1/#comment-9802</link>
		<dc:creator>www.centralcontracts.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 11:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usabilityblog.com/2010/02/lings-cars-it-works/#comment-9802</guid>
		<description>It really does work and people are talking about it! Always a good sign. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It really does work and people are talking about it! Always a good sign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: http://www.leasecar.co.uk</title>
		<link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2010/02/lings-cars-it-works/comment-page-1/#comment-9789</link>
		<dc:creator>http://www.leasecar.co.uk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 09:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usabilityblog.com/2010/02/lings-cars-it-works/#comment-9789</guid>
		<description>I love Lings website personally and I think it really works. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love Lings website personally and I think it really works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry Charles Richardson</title>
		<link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2010/02/lings-cars-it-works/comment-page-1/#comment-9563</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry Charles Richardson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 11:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usabilityblog.com/2010/02/lings-cars-it-works/#comment-9563</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re wrong when you say &quot;Ling’s Cars…our prices are so low, we don’t even bother spending a lot of money on our site…we just home-build it so we can keep our prices low.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I can categorically confirm that a lot of vehicles on Lings website are the exact same price on other &quot;More proffessional&quot; looking sites.  Indeed, several vehicles are actually more expensive on her site.  Don&#039;t forget, she has to earn a living, thus, she must and obviously does, turn a profit!  Don&#039;t be fooled, she is still a business woman!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#39;re wrong when you say &#8220;Ling’s Cars…our prices are so low, we don’t even bother spending a lot of money on our site…we just home-build it so we can keep our prices low.&#8221;</p>
<p>I can categorically confirm that a lot of vehicles on Lings website are the exact same price on other &#8220;More proffessional&#8221; looking sites.  Indeed, several vehicles are actually more expensive on her site.  Don&#39;t forget, she has to earn a living, thus, she must and obviously does, turn a profit!  Don&#39;t be fooled, she is still a business woman!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2010/02/lings-cars-it-works/comment-page-1/#comment-9456</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 00:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usabilityblog.com/2010/02/lings-cars-it-works/#comment-9456</guid>
		<description>As regards reputation, all of Ling&#039;s shenanigans are hugely beneficial. The image of car dealers in the UK is that they are vicious lying bastards looking to con you out of every last penny. Ling&#039;s folksy, happy-go-lucky image is the perfect antidote to the slick, sharkish image people associate with car dealers. She might come across as crazy, but she certainly doesn&#039;t look like she&#039;s out to rip you off - if she was, wouldn&#039;t she try and look more professional?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As regards reputation, all of Ling&#39;s shenanigans are hugely beneficial. The image of car dealers in the UK is that they are vicious lying bastards looking to con you out of every last penny. Ling&#39;s folksy, happy-go-lucky image is the perfect antidote to the slick, sharkish image people associate with car dealers. She might come across as crazy, but she certainly doesn&#39;t look like she&#39;s out to rip you off &#8211; if she was, wouldn&#39;t she try and look more professional?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: e_mann</title>
		<link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2010/02/lings-cars-it-works/comment-page-1/#comment-9365</link>
		<dc:creator>e_mann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 03:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usabilityblog.com/2010/02/lings-cars-it-works/#comment-9365</guid>
		<description>And does LingsCars works? the answer is... it is very successful in the light of the publicity it&#039;s been given.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And does LingsCars works? the answer is&#8230; it is very successful in the light of the publicity it&#39;s been given.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: e_mann</title>
		<link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2010/02/lings-cars-it-works/comment-page-1/#comment-9364</link>
		<dc:creator>e_mann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 03:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usabilityblog.com/2010/02/lings-cars-it-works/#comment-9364</guid>
		<description>Am actually writin a report on LINGsCARs for usability, and for once let&#039;s be reasonable this outfit is successful at what it does. More or less the concept of usability by itself is pure academics. because the underlying point for me here is ït works&quot;...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Several HCI researchers in recent times have produced sets of generic usability principles namely: learnability, visibility, consistency and standards, flexibility, robustness, responsiveness, feedback, constraints, mappings, affordances, stability, simplicity, memorability, help, and documentation to buttress the underlying assessment issues. But even in the light of the ongoing, it is still very much important to make sure the old fashioned precept of functionality serves as the fundamental basis for designing any computer interaction system. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Plain speaking usability is a mix of both objective and subjective assessment....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Saw her on you-tube... loved her ethusiasm... either we like it or not... being classified as one of the worst site out there adds to her popularity.... and who says anything about not wanting to do business with LingsCars... I &#039;ll surely DO!!!!...it&#039;s even got a proven track record...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am actually writin a report on LINGsCARs for usability, and for once let&#39;s be reasonable this outfit is successful at what it does. More or less the concept of usability by itself is pure academics. because the underlying point for me here is ït works&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>Several HCI researchers in recent times have produced sets of generic usability principles namely: learnability, visibility, consistency and standards, flexibility, robustness, responsiveness, feedback, constraints, mappings, affordances, stability, simplicity, memorability, help, and documentation to buttress the underlying assessment issues. But even in the light of the ongoing, it is still very much important to make sure the old fashioned precept of functionality serves as the fundamental basis for designing any computer interaction system. </p>
<p>Plain speaking usability is a mix of both objective and subjective assessment&#8230;.</p>
<p>Saw her on you-tube&#8230; loved her ethusiasm&#8230; either we like it or not&#8230; being classified as one of the worst site out there adds to her popularity&#8230;. and who says anything about not wanting to do business with LingsCars&#8230; I &#39;ll surely DO!!!!&#8230;it&#39;s even got a proven track record&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: e_mann</title>
		<link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2010/02/lings-cars-it-works/comment-page-1/#comment-9339</link>
		<dc:creator>e_mann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 22:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usabilityblog.com/2010/02/lings-cars-it-works/#comment-9339</guid>
		<description>Several HCI researchers in recent times have produced sets of generic usability principles namely: learnability, visibility, consistency and standards, flexibility, robustness, responsiveness, feedback, constraints, mappings, affordances, stability, simplicity, memorability, help, and documentation to buttress the underlying assessment issues. But even in the light of the ongoing, it is still very much important to make sure the old fashioned precept of functionality serves as the fundamental basis for designing any computer interaction system. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And does LingsCars works? the answer is it is very sucessful in the light of the publicity it&#039;s been given. LingsCars has made the most of the publicity, and did someone ask if you people will want to do business. As for me, the answer is a capital YES!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several HCI researchers in recent times have produced sets of generic usability principles namely: learnability, visibility, consistency and standards, flexibility, robustness, responsiveness, feedback, constraints, mappings, affordances, stability, simplicity, memorability, help, and documentation to buttress the underlying assessment issues. But even in the light of the ongoing, it is still very much important to make sure the old fashioned precept of functionality serves as the fundamental basis for designing any computer interaction system. </p>
<p>And does LingsCars works? the answer is it is very sucessful in the light of the publicity it&#39;s been given. LingsCars has made the most of the publicity, and did someone ask if you people will want to do business. As for me, the answer is a capital YES!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: e_mann</title>
		<link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2010/02/lings-cars-it-works/comment-page-1/#comment-9338</link>
		<dc:creator>e_mann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 22:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usabilityblog.com/2010/02/lings-cars-it-works/#comment-9338</guid>
		<description>Am actually writin a report on LINGsCARs for usability, and for once let&#039;s be reasonable this outfit is successful at what it does. More or less the concept of usability by itself is pure academics. because the underlying point for me here is ït works&quot;...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Several HCI researchers in recent times have produced sets of generic usability principles namely: learnability, visibility, consistency and standards, flexibility, robustness, responsiveness, feedback, constraints, mappings, affordances, stability, simplicity, memorability, help, and documentation to buttress the underlying assessment issues. But even in the light of the ongoing, it is still very much important to make sure the old fashioned precept of functionality serves as the fundamental basis for designing any computer interaction system. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Plain speaking usability is a mix of both objective and subjective assessment....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Saw her on you-tube... loved her ethusiasm... either we like it or not... being classified as one of the worst site out there adds to her popularity.... and who says anything about not wanting to do business with LingsCars... I &#039;ll surely DO!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am actually writin a report on LINGsCARs for usability, and for once let&#39;s be reasonable this outfit is successful at what it does. More or less the concept of usability by itself is pure academics. because the underlying point for me here is ït works&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>Several HCI researchers in recent times have produced sets of generic usability principles namely: learnability, visibility, consistency and standards, flexibility, robustness, responsiveness, feedback, constraints, mappings, affordances, stability, simplicity, memorability, help, and documentation to buttress the underlying assessment issues. But even in the light of the ongoing, it is still very much important to make sure the old fashioned precept of functionality serves as the fundamental basis for designing any computer interaction system. </p>
<p>Plain speaking usability is a mix of both objective and subjective assessment&#8230;.</p>
<p>Saw her on you-tube&#8230; loved her ethusiasm&#8230; either we like it or not&#8230; being classified as one of the worst site out there adds to her popularity&#8230;. and who says anything about not wanting to do business with LingsCars&#8230; I &#39;ll surely DO!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LingValentine</title>
		<link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2010/02/lings-cars-it-works/comment-page-1/#comment-9271</link>
		<dc:creator>LingValentine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 21:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usabilityblog.com/2010/02/lings-cars-it-works/#comment-9271</guid>
		<description>Welllllllllllllllll....,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hahaha, it is an emotional decision (to get a car). It is not logical. If it was we would all drive a Ford Focus or (insert boring car). Have you seen Top Gear?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Look, you need people to ENJOY websites, and 50% of my visitors will. 50% (I would hate to suggest some anal retention) will go on about usability blah blah. There are very few websites where you can ENJOY yourself (but you are in the 50% below that get annoyed, not enjoyed - is that English?).&lt;br&gt;To be sensible for 10 seconds, people choose a new car approx once every 3 or 4 years. That&#039;s a LONG product cycle. So 99.9% of people don&#039;t want one today. So, I need them to remember me and come back. It&#039;s a MASSIVE purchase for a 100% online sale. It&#039;s not Amazon you know, these are not $9.99 books. People want &quot;cheap&quot;. Also want &quot;new&quot;, &quot;big&quot;, &quot;free&quot; and &quot;sex&quot;. The 5 magic webwords.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Name one other car leasing company you remember or even choose to discuss? You can&#039;t. See? Name one other car leasing company or dealership who would even notice you had blogged about them, the same day? And replied in a cohesive manner (?).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My site does polarise, it does annoy, and it does work. Yes, yes, yes. But of course, some like it, some hate it. At least you have an opinion :) In a very difficult mature market, with massive branded competition all selling the same basic product, it differentiates. No one else ever manages that. Plus have you tried really USING any car dealer&#039;s website? Pass the razor blades. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am looking at my 7373rd visitor online today, with 71 concurrent on my site (today was/is busy). No one else manages that in my industry apart from Autotrader and eBay motors etc. Certainly no independents manage it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So, stop thinking too hard. I did a full presentation last week to Newcastle University based IT community &quot;SuperMonkeys&quot; here: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lingscars.com/supermondays.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.lingscars.com/supermondays.php&lt;/a&gt; (which other car company gets invited to do that?). Watch the films if you want.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also read how Web Design Magazine &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lingscars.com/news.php#webdesignermag&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.lingscars.com/news.php#webdesignermag&lt;/a&gt; had to eat humble pie IN PRINT after I won the BT Business/NatWest IT and Communications award (for whole of UK) in December.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Happy to discuss. Chill dude, keep writing. Thx for the discussion.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ling&lt;br&gt;LINGsCARS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welllllllllllllllll&#8230;.,</p>
<p>Hahaha, it is an emotional decision (to get a car). It is not logical. If it was we would all drive a Ford Focus or (insert boring car). Have you seen Top Gear?</p>
<p>Look, you need people to ENJOY websites, and 50% of my visitors will. 50% (I would hate to suggest some anal retention) will go on about usability blah blah. There are very few websites where you can ENJOY yourself (but you are in the 50% below that get annoyed, not enjoyed &#8211; is that English?).<br />To be sensible for 10 seconds, people choose a new car approx once every 3 or 4 years. That&#39;s a LONG product cycle. So 99.9% of people don&#39;t want one today. So, I need them to remember me and come back. It&#39;s a MASSIVE purchase for a 100% online sale. It&#39;s not Amazon you know, these are not $9.99 books. People want &#8220;cheap&#8221;. Also want &#8220;new&#8221;, &#8220;big&#8221;, &#8220;free&#8221; and &#8220;sex&#8221;. The 5 magic webwords.</p>
<p>Name one other car leasing company you remember or even choose to discuss? You can&#39;t. See? Name one other car leasing company or dealership who would even notice you had blogged about them, the same day? And replied in a cohesive manner (?).</p>
<p>My site does polarise, it does annoy, and it does work. Yes, yes, yes. But of course, some like it, some hate it. At least you have an opinion :) In a very difficult mature market, with massive branded competition all selling the same basic product, it differentiates. No one else ever manages that. Plus have you tried really USING any car dealer&#39;s website? Pass the razor blades. </p>
<p>I am looking at my 7373rd visitor online today, with 71 concurrent on my site (today was/is busy). No one else manages that in my industry apart from Autotrader and eBay motors etc. Certainly no independents manage it.</p>
<p>So, stop thinking too hard. I did a full presentation last week to Newcastle University based IT community &#8220;SuperMonkeys&#8221; here: <a href="http://www.lingscars.com/supermondays.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.lingscars.com/supermondays.php</a> (which other car company gets invited to do that?). Watch the films if you want.</p>
<p>Also read how Web Design Magazine <a href="http://www.lingscars.com/news.php#webdesignermag" rel="nofollow">http://www.lingscars.com/news.php#webdesignermag</a> had to eat humble pie IN PRINT after I won the BT Business/NatWest IT and Communications award (for whole of UK) in December.</p>
<p>Happy to discuss. Chill dude, keep writing. Thx for the discussion.</p>
<p>Ling<br />LINGsCARS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pjsherman</title>
		<link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2010/02/lings-cars-it-works/comment-page-1/#comment-9269</link>
		<dc:creator>pjsherman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usabilityblog.com/2010/02/lings-cars-it-works/#comment-9269</guid>
		<description>I like your take on this. I seem to find myself in false dichotomies a bit too often than I&#039;d like to admit. Thanks for the comments! -Paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like your take on this. I seem to find myself in false dichotomies a bit too often than I&#39;d like to admit. Thanks for the comments! -Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neovenator</title>
		<link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2010/02/lings-cars-it-works/comment-page-1/#comment-9267</link>
		<dc:creator>neovenator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 15:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usabilityblog.com/2010/02/lings-cars-it-works/#comment-9267</guid>
		<description>I think there&#039;s a fasle dichotomy here between a site working and a site not working. For instance, yes, I could manage to to complete all the tasks that you listed - but to be honest, it wasn&#039;t easy, and took longer than it should have. The site simply doesn&#039;t manage the user&#039;s attention effectively enough to allow that. And that&#039;s not to mention online trust - the website does not project the image of a professional site that you would want to hand your money over to.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think the correct response is to say that Ling&#039;s Cars is not half as bad as you&#039;d expect, and that it works well enough in a number of ways. That&#039;s not to say that it works per se, however. And the irony here is that a simpler site would probably be cheaper to develop and maintain - serve the organisation&#039;s goals better.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Still, I get your overall point about poor design meeting an organisation&#039;s requirements.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there&#39;s a fasle dichotomy here between a site working and a site not working. For instance, yes, I could manage to to complete all the tasks that you listed &#8211; but to be honest, it wasn&#39;t easy, and took longer than it should have. The site simply doesn&#39;t manage the user&#39;s attention effectively enough to allow that. And that&#39;s not to mention online trust &#8211; the website does not project the image of a professional site that you would want to hand your money over to.</p>
<p>I think the correct response is to say that Ling&#39;s Cars is not half as bad as you&#39;d expect, and that it works well enough in a number of ways. That&#39;s not to say that it works per se, however. And the irony here is that a simpler site would probably be cheaper to develop and maintain &#8211; serve the organisation&#39;s goals better.</p>
<p>Still, I get your overall point about poor design meeting an organisation&#39;s requirements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

