<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tablets Are (Probably) Superfluous</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.usabilityblog.com/2010/02/tablets-are-probably-superfluous/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2010/02/tablets-are-probably-superfluous/</link>
	<description>Blogging about user experience, usability, and design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 08:54:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: pjsherman</title>
		<link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2010/02/tablets-are-probably-superfluous/comment-page-1/#comment-9391</link>
		<dc:creator>pjsherman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 01:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usabilityblog.com/?p=601#comment-9391</guid>
		<description>Great comments Tom, Dano, and Neil. Much appreciated. Incidentally, and I SWEAR I didn&#039;t see this before writing this post, Engadget has a link to a Youtube video showing a Citrix researcher working on a full KVM setup that&#039;s connected to his handset. It&#039;s called the Citrix Nirvana (and I *want* one). &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here&#039;s the link: &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/02/citrix-nirvana-phone-provides-the-full-desktop-experience-byo/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/02/citrix-nirva...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great comments Tom, Dano, and Neil. Much appreciated. Incidentally, and I SWEAR I didn&#39;t see this before writing this post, Engadget has a link to a Youtube video showing a Citrix researcher working on a full KVM setup that&#39;s connected to his handset. It&#39;s called the Citrix Nirvana (and I *want* one). </p>
<p>Here&#39;s the link: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/02/citrix-nirvana-phone-provides-the-full-desktop-experience-byo/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/02/citrix-nirva.." rel="nofollow">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/02/citrix-nirva..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilganey</title>
		<link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2010/02/tablets-are-probably-superfluous/comment-page-1/#comment-9390</link>
		<dc:creator>neilganey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 23:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usabilityblog.com/?p=601#comment-9390</guid>
		<description>With the iPhone and other devices, the promise seemed to be the ability to perform a set of tasks above and beyond the capability of the average phone, while not detracting from the portability. Notebooks are just not portable enough for carrying everyplace. With the iPad, though, you can&#039;t just clip it to your belt or slip it in your pocket. So, you have to either carry a bag with you everywhere or occupy a hand to carry it. We had cell phones like that at one time...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Separately, you see the value of the iPad as high enough to warrant spending another $500+ (above the cost of your notebook and phone) to get a device that would be for scenario-dependent use?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the iPhone and other devices, the promise seemed to be the ability to perform a set of tasks above and beyond the capability of the average phone, while not detracting from the portability. Notebooks are just not portable enough for carrying everyplace. With the iPad, though, you can&#39;t just clip it to your belt or slip it in your pocket. So, you have to either carry a bag with you everywhere or occupy a hand to carry it. We had cell phones like that at one time&#8230;</p>
<p>Separately, you see the value of the iPad as high enough to warrant spending another $500+ (above the cost of your notebook and phone) to get a device that would be for scenario-dependent use?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Brinck</title>
		<link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2010/02/tablets-are-probably-superfluous/comment-page-1/#comment-9389</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Brinck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 22:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usabilityblog.com/?p=601#comment-9389</guid>
		<description>When I got my iPhone, I was quite surprised that it ended up replacing at least half the time I spent on my computer (outside of work, of course).  This was a result of the increased mobility, the instant-on aspect, simplification of the UI (and reduction of &quot;management&quot; tasks), and the fact that there were more useful and convenient apps available for it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I expect if I had a good tablet, such as the iPad, a similar phenomenon would occur.  The iPhone still isn&#039;t great for a number of things that can use a bigger screen, but I expect an iPad will allow me to abandon my computer for another 90% of my computer tasks, except for work of course, since my work involves heavy Photoshop and reasonably heavy word processing.  (Of course, that&#039;s not true of everyone&#039;s work, and I also dream someday of a good tablet for my design work, which I believe can be much better than a mouse-keyboard combination...someday.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I would prefer using a good tablet for web browsing, email, eBook reading (a new task), large-screen gaming, mobile movie viewing (which I do more than in the living room), and probably some other tasks.  For example, in my mornings, like today, I read the news online and my email, and would be happier with a tablet than my laptop.  The laptop wouldn&#039;t even come out.  In addition, for a lot of travel, like a 3-day weekend trip or an international trip, I would not even bother to bring my laptop, but would find a  tablet a handy tool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I got my iPhone, I was quite surprised that it ended up replacing at least half the time I spent on my computer (outside of work, of course).  This was a result of the increased mobility, the instant-on aspect, simplification of the UI (and reduction of &#8220;management&#8221; tasks), and the fact that there were more useful and convenient apps available for it.</p>
<p>I expect if I had a good tablet, such as the iPad, a similar phenomenon would occur.  The iPhone still isn&#39;t great for a number of things that can use a bigger screen, but I expect an iPad will allow me to abandon my computer for another 90% of my computer tasks, except for work of course, since my work involves heavy Photoshop and reasonably heavy word processing.  (Of course, that&#39;s not true of everyone&#39;s work, and I also dream someday of a good tablet for my design work, which I believe can be much better than a mouse-keyboard combination&#8230;someday.)</p>
<p>I would prefer using a good tablet for web browsing, email, eBook reading (a new task), large-screen gaming, mobile movie viewing (which I do more than in the living room), and probably some other tasks.  For example, in my mornings, like today, I read the news online and my email, and would be happier with a tablet than my laptop.  The laptop wouldn&#39;t even come out.  In addition, for a lot of travel, like a 3-day weekend trip or an international trip, I would not even bother to bring my laptop, but would find a  tablet a handy tool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilganey</title>
		<link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2010/02/tablets-are-probably-superfluous/comment-page-1/#comment-9388</link>
		<dc:creator>neilganey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 20:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usabilityblog.com/?p=601#comment-9388</guid>
		<description>Daniel, I think that you bring up a good point, but I wonder about the occurrence of those moments/contexts and whether those are frequent/long enough to drive a whole new device class. The fact is that you were able to get by with your two devices. If you had one, would you just bring an iPad with you on travel or would you bring all three devices, selectively using each as the moment dictated?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel, I think that you bring up a good point, but I wonder about the occurrence of those moments/contexts and whether those are frequent/long enough to drive a whole new device class. The fact is that you were able to get by with your two devices. If you had one, would you just bring an iPad with you on travel or would you bring all three devices, selectively using each as the moment dictated?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pjsherman</title>
		<link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2010/02/tablets-are-probably-superfluous/comment-page-1/#comment-9280</link>
		<dc:creator>pjsherman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 20:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usabilityblog.com/?p=601#comment-9280</guid>
		<description>Great comments Tom, Dano, and Neil. Much appreciated. Incidentally, and I SWEAR I didn&#039;t see this before writing this post, Engadget has a link to a Youtube video showing a Citrix researcher working on a full KVM setup that&#039;s connected to his handset. It&#039;s called the Citrix Nirvana (and I *want* one). &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here&#039;s the link: &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/02/citrix-nirvana-phone-provides-the-full-desktop-experience-byo/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/02/citrix-nirva...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great comments Tom, Dano, and Neil. Much appreciated. Incidentally, and I SWEAR I didn&#39;t see this before writing this post, Engadget has a link to a Youtube video showing a Citrix researcher working on a full KVM setup that&#39;s connected to his handset. It&#39;s called the Citrix Nirvana (and I *want* one). </p>
<p>Here&#39;s the link: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/02/citrix-nirvana-phone-provides-the-full-desktop-experience-byo/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/02/citrix-nirva.." rel="nofollow">http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/02/citrix-nirva..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilganey</title>
		<link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2010/02/tablets-are-probably-superfluous/comment-page-1/#comment-9279</link>
		<dc:creator>neilganey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 18:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usabilityblog.com/?p=601#comment-9279</guid>
		<description>With the iPhone and other devices, the promise seemed to be the ability to perform a set of tasks above and beyond the capability of the average phone, while not detracting from the portability. Notebooks are just not portable enough for carrying everyplace. With the iPad, though, you can&#039;t just clip it to your belt or slip it in your pocket. So, you have to either carry a bag with you everywhere or occupy a hand to carry it. We had cell phones like that at one time...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Separately, you see the value of the iPad as high enough to warrant spending another $500+ (above the cost of your notebook and phone) to get a device that would be for scenario-dependent use?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the iPhone and other devices, the promise seemed to be the ability to perform a set of tasks above and beyond the capability of the average phone, while not detracting from the portability. Notebooks are just not portable enough for carrying everyplace. With the iPad, though, you can&#39;t just clip it to your belt or slip it in your pocket. So, you have to either carry a bag with you everywhere or occupy a hand to carry it. We had cell phones like that at one time&#8230;</p>
<p>Separately, you see the value of the iPad as high enough to warrant spending another $500+ (above the cost of your notebook and phone) to get a device that would be for scenario-dependent use?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tombrinck</title>
		<link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2010/02/tablets-are-probably-superfluous/comment-page-1/#comment-9278</link>
		<dc:creator>tombrinck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 17:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usabilityblog.com/?p=601#comment-9278</guid>
		<description>When I got my iPhone, I was quite surprised that it ended up replacing at least half the time I spent on my computer (outside of work, of course).  This was a result of the increased mobility, the instant-on aspect, simplification of the UI (and reduction of &quot;management&quot; tasks), and the fact that there were more useful and convenient apps available for it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I expect if I had a good tablet, such as the iPad, a similar phenomenon would occur.  The iPhone still isn&#039;t great for a number of things that can use a bigger screen, but I expect an iPad will allow me to abandon my computer for another 90% of my computer tasks, except for work of course, since my work involves heavy Photoshop and reasonably heavy word processing.  (Of course, that&#039;s not true of everyone&#039;s work, and I also dream someday of a good tablet for my design work, which I believe can be much better than a mouse-keyboard combination...someday.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I would prefer using a good tablet for web browsing, email, eBook reading (a new task), large-screen gaming, mobile movie viewing (which I do more than in the living room), and probably some other tasks.  For example, in my mornings, like today, I read the news online and my email, and would be happier with a tablet than my laptop.  The laptop wouldn&#039;t even come out.  In addition, for a lot of travel, like a 3-day weekend trip or an international trip, I would not even bother to bring my laptop, but would find a  tablet a handy tool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I got my iPhone, I was quite surprised that it ended up replacing at least half the time I spent on my computer (outside of work, of course).  This was a result of the increased mobility, the instant-on aspect, simplification of the UI (and reduction of &#8220;management&#8221; tasks), and the fact that there were more useful and convenient apps available for it.</p>
<p>I expect if I had a good tablet, such as the iPad, a similar phenomenon would occur.  The iPhone still isn&#39;t great for a number of things that can use a bigger screen, but I expect an iPad will allow me to abandon my computer for another 90% of my computer tasks, except for work of course, since my work involves heavy Photoshop and reasonably heavy word processing.  (Of course, that&#39;s not true of everyone&#39;s work, and I also dream someday of a good tablet for my design work, which I believe can be much better than a mouse-keyboard combination&#8230;someday.)</p>
<p>I would prefer using a good tablet for web browsing, email, eBook reading (a new task), large-screen gaming, mobile movie viewing (which I do more than in the living room), and probably some other tasks.  For example, in my mornings, like today, I read the news online and my email, and would be happier with a tablet than my laptop.  The laptop wouldn&#39;t even come out.  In addition, for a lot of travel, like a 3-day weekend trip or an international trip, I would not even bother to bring my laptop, but would find a  tablet a handy tool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilganey</title>
		<link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2010/02/tablets-are-probably-superfluous/comment-page-1/#comment-9277</link>
		<dc:creator>neilganey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 15:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usabilityblog.com/?p=601#comment-9277</guid>
		<description>Daniel, I think that you bring up a good point, but I wonder about the occurrence of those moments/contexts and whether those are frequent/long enough to drive a whole new device class. The fact is that you were able to get by with your two devices. If you had one, would you just bring an iPad with you on travel or would you bring all three devices, selectively using each as the moment dictated?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel, I think that you bring up a good point, but I wonder about the occurrence of those moments/contexts and whether those are frequent/long enough to drive a whole new device class. The fact is that you were able to get by with your two devices. If you had one, would you just bring an iPad with you on travel or would you bring all three devices, selectively using each as the moment dictated?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Szuc</title>
		<link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2010/02/tablets-are-probably-superfluous/comment-page-1/#comment-9276</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Szuc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usabilityblog.com/?p=601#comment-9276</guid>
		<description>The iPad will open up new interactions and moments (that may enhance what the iphone, netbook and desktop cannot provide). As the SDK develops, developers now have the opportunity to develop into this context. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As I flew over the USA yesterday and connected to the inflight Wifi using a mix of my desktop and ipod touch - there was a number of tasks that could have been better facilitated through the iPad. So the moments/context where the iPad will work into, is of interest to me</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The iPad will open up new interactions and moments (that may enhance what the iphone, netbook and desktop cannot provide). As the SDK develops, developers now have the opportunity to develop into this context. </p>
<p>As I flew over the USA yesterday and connected to the inflight Wifi using a mix of my desktop and ipod touch &#8211; there was a number of tasks that could have been better facilitated through the iPad. So the moments/context where the iPad will work into, is of interest to me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pjsherman</title>
		<link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2010/02/tablets-are-probably-superfluous/comment-page-1/#comment-9275</link>
		<dc:creator>pjsherman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 23:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usabilityblog.com/?p=601#comment-9275</guid>
		<description>Great observations, Neil. Especially about the physical vs. virtual keyboard, and the potential tipping point being driven by the texting masses. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Anecdotally, I&#039;ve found that if I stop worrying so much while typing on the iPhone and just go fast, the correction algorithm catches and fixes almost all my errors. But if I try to type slowly and deliberately, I actually commit more errors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great observations, Neil. Especially about the physical vs. virtual keyboard, and the potential tipping point being driven by the texting masses. </p>
<p>Anecdotally, I&#39;ve found that if I stop worrying so much while typing on the iPhone and just go fast, the correction algorithm catches and fixes almost all my errors. But if I try to type slowly and deliberately, I actually commit more errors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Ganey</title>
		<link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2010/02/tablets-are-probably-superfluous/comment-page-1/#comment-9272</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Ganey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usabilityblog.com/?p=601#comment-9272</guid>
		<description>I agree with you. Some thoughts...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Portability is a big issue and the iPad just doesn&#039;t meet the need. People have become way too accustomed with carrying a phone-sized device, one that men and women can easily carry on their person. While the iPad could fit into some purses, it definitely doesn&#039;t fit into all. Also, what of the male user? How do they tote it? It&#039;s not going to be a candidate for a belt clip. So, that means toting a bag or occupying a hand. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;With that in mind, I think that as more products like this come out, users will (potentially) begin opening their minds to new types of interaction. Frankly, as much as I like the physical keyboard, it is constraining the amount of size reduction that can be done to a device, while still retaining the &quot;typing&quot; experience. Now, as kids who can quickly input information on touchscreens or by using 10-key on phones grow up, the standard input devices on &quot;systems&quot; may well change. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On a side note, it seems like a number of people have jumped to conclusions about what the iPad &lt;u&gt;will be&lt;/u&gt; able to do. While the device cannot do a number of these things, it does reveal a few interesting things. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;First, users expect Apple to meet/exceed their expectations, though not always on the first try. For evidence, see the first few generations of the iPod. &lt;br&gt;Second, the users believe that Apple hears what they say and is responsive. &lt;br&gt;Third, this all makes things for the iPad product manager very simple because he now has a ready-made requirements document and justifications.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you. Some thoughts&#8230;</p>
<p>Portability is a big issue and the iPad just doesn&#39;t meet the need. People have become way too accustomed with carrying a phone-sized device, one that men and women can easily carry on their person. While the iPad could fit into some purses, it definitely doesn&#39;t fit into all. Also, what of the male user? How do they tote it? It&#39;s not going to be a candidate for a belt clip. So, that means toting a bag or occupying a hand. </p>
<p>With that in mind, I think that as more products like this come out, users will (potentially) begin opening their minds to new types of interaction. Frankly, as much as I like the physical keyboard, it is constraining the amount of size reduction that can be done to a device, while still retaining the &#8220;typing&#8221; experience. Now, as kids who can quickly input information on touchscreens or by using 10-key on phones grow up, the standard input devices on &#8220;systems&#8221; may well change. </p>
<p>On a side note, it seems like a number of people have jumped to conclusions about what the iPad <u>will be</u> able to do. While the device cannot do a number of these things, it does reveal a few interesting things. </p>
<p>First, users expect Apple to meet/exceed their expectations, though not always on the first try. For evidence, see the first few generations of the iPod. <br />Second, the users believe that Apple hears what they say and is responsive. <br />Third, this all makes things for the iPad product manager very simple because he now has a ready-made requirements document and justifications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
