<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Props From Scott Berkun on Selling UX</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.usabilityblog.com/2010/03/props-from-scott-berkun-on-selling-ux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2010/03/props-from-scott-berkun-on-selling-ux/</link>
	<description>Blogging about usability, user experience and design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:40:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: olga-lednichenko-nesher-israel</title>
		<link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2010/03/props-from-scott-berkun-on-selling-ux/comment-page-1/#comment-9494</link>
		<dc:creator>olga-lednichenko-nesher-israel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 21:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usabilityblog.com/?p=679#comment-9494</guid>
		<description>you are right and the reasons - me thinks are:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;[1] appreciation on either side on what&#039;s involved and what&#039;s the incremental impact&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;[2] lack of a common language - between the client and the designer ie,.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;regards&lt;br&gt;olga-lednichenko-nesher</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you are right and the reasons &#8211; me thinks are:</p>
<p>[1] appreciation on either side on what&#39;s involved and what&#39;s the incremental impact</p>
<p>[2] lack of a common language &#8211; between the client and the designer ie,.</p>
<p>regards<br />olga-lednichenko-nesher</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pjsherman</title>
		<link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2010/03/props-from-scott-berkun-on-selling-ux/comment-page-1/#comment-9493</link>
		<dc:creator>pjsherman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 20:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usabilityblog.com/?p=679#comment-9493</guid>
		<description>Thanks for dropping by UsabilityBlog Scott. If I had to venture a guess, I think the reluctance to persuade stems from my contention that most of us are utterly convinced of the rightness of our ways. After all - and this is a good thing - most of us stumbled onto this field and found it a fantastic lens through which to project our ethical expression onto the world. UX is a place to be a force for good. How awesome is that? Answer: quite awesome indeed. So why *wouldn&#039;t* everyone see our opinions as correct? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think our moral certitude gets in our way. In other words: UX&#039;ers belief in our own rightness is quasi-religious. There&#039;s no need to persuade others of our rightness; we know we&#039;re right. And if they don&#039;t believe us, frak &#039;em. Only there&#039;s that pesky little issue of who&#039;s cutting the checks....hmmm, I better tow the line and try to convince those who labor in the darkness of not knowing UX, even though they&#039;re little more than inmates running the dark asylum...I think you can see where I&#039;m going with this. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My bottom line advice to our field would be very similar to what my Jewish mother from Queens often says: hey UX&#039;ers, get over yourselves. We don&#039;t poop roses. Not everything we do is an expression of our moral superiority. We don&#039;t see the big picture. And we don&#039;t know what it&#039;s like to be on the hook for the revenue projections for a product. In other words, we should have a little more empathy and broaden our horizons a bit. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;ve made these points before; check this article out for a slightly more poiished version of this argument: &lt;a href=&quot;http://bit.ly/a2Xwux&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://bit.ly/a2Xwux&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks again, Scott.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for dropping by UsabilityBlog Scott. If I had to venture a guess, I think the reluctance to persuade stems from my contention that most of us are utterly convinced of the rightness of our ways. After all &#8211; and this is a good thing &#8211; most of us stumbled onto this field and found it a fantastic lens through which to project our ethical expression onto the world. UX is a place to be a force for good. How awesome is that? Answer: quite awesome indeed. So why *wouldn&#39;t* everyone see our opinions as correct? </p>
<p>I think our moral certitude gets in our way. In other words: UX&#39;ers belief in our own rightness is quasi-religious. There&#39;s no need to persuade others of our rightness; we know we&#39;re right. And if they don&#39;t believe us, frak &#39;em. Only there&#39;s that pesky little issue of who&#39;s cutting the checks&#8230;.hmmm, I better tow the line and try to convince those who labor in the darkness of not knowing UX, even though they&#39;re little more than inmates running the dark asylum&#8230;I think you can see where I&#39;m going with this. </p>
<p>My bottom line advice to our field would be very similar to what my Jewish mother from Queens often says: hey UX&#39;ers, get over yourselves. We don&#39;t poop roses. Not everything we do is an expression of our moral superiority. We don&#39;t see the big picture. And we don&#39;t know what it&#39;s like to be on the hook for the revenue projections for a product. In other words, we should have a little more empathy and broaden our horizons a bit. </p>
<p>I&#39;ve made these points before; check this article out for a slightly more poiished version of this argument: <a href="http://bit.ly/a2Xwux" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/a2Xwux</a></p>
<p>Thanks again, Scott.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Berkun</title>
		<link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2010/03/props-from-scott-berkun-on-selling-ux/comment-page-1/#comment-9491</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Berkun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 21:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usabilityblog.com/?p=679#comment-9491</guid>
		<description>The curious thing is why this fairly old idea (specialists need to persuade) has such a hard time gaining traction among the UI/IX/HCI community. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And oddly, it&#039;s seems really hard to sell the UI community on the point of view you offer. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Do you have any theories as to why this is?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I did a study of sorts on designers about why they fail to explore this question among the design community. But I have thought about doing a similiar thing for the usability/HCI side of things:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scottberkun.com/blog/2008/why-designers-fail-the-report/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.scottberkun.com/blog/2008/why-design...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The curious thing is why this fairly old idea (specialists need to persuade) has such a hard time gaining traction among the UI/IX/HCI community. </p>
<p>And oddly, it&#39;s seems really hard to sell the UI community on the point of view you offer. </p>
<p>Do you have any theories as to why this is?</p>
<p>I did a study of sorts on designers about why they fail to explore this question among the design community. But I have thought about doing a similiar thing for the usability/HCI side of things:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.scottberkun.com/blog/2008/why-designers-fail-the-report/" rel="nofollow">http://www.scottberkun.com/blog/2008/why-design&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

