<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lowering Conversion The Quick And Easy Way</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.usabilityblog.com/2010/03/starbucks-email-fail-lowering-conversion-the-quick-and-easy-way/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2010/03/starbucks-email-fail-lowering-conversion-the-quick-and-easy-way/</link>
	<description>Blogging about usability, user experience and design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:40:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lou Storiale</title>
		<link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2010/03/starbucks-email-fail-lowering-conversion-the-quick-and-easy-way/comment-page-1/#comment-9594</link>
		<dc:creator>Lou Storiale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 09:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usabilityblog.com/?p=660#comment-9594</guid>
		<description>Good point.  I&#039;ll have to check on some of my client sites to ensure they do as well.  Thanks for the reminder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point.  I&#39;ll have to check on some of my client sites to ensure they do as well.  Thanks for the reminder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: olga-lednichenko-nesher-israel</title>
		<link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2010/03/starbucks-email-fail-lowering-conversion-the-quick-and-easy-way/comment-page-1/#comment-9550</link>
		<dc:creator>olga-lednichenko-nesher-israel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 13:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usabilityblog.com/?p=660#comment-9550</guid>
		<description>Thanks for bringing this up. love this blog -&gt; you know what - you should make a list of all the &quot;How to ensure users stay away from your site &quot; list followed by such examples as you do come up with.. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have one too - that I posted on my blog -&gt; its the CAPTCHA .. add that to your list as well..&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;everyone from guy Kawasaki to your average Jane and John Doe and who knows who else has suffered from that - unreadable Captcha.. its funny it says &quot; are you human&quot; -&gt; well, its precisely because i am human, i missed the captcha the 7th time - and hence am quitting.. Try Yahoo and even Harvard business Review blog &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;i am not joking.. or maybe you guys have some secret sauce?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;regards&lt;br&gt;olga-lednichenko-shulman&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;nesher rocks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for bringing this up. love this blog -&gt; you know what &#8211; you should make a list of all the &#8220;How to ensure users stay away from your site &#8221; list followed by such examples as you do come up with.. </p>
<p>I have one too &#8211; that I posted on my blog -&gt; its the CAPTCHA .. add that to your list as well..</p>
<p>everyone from guy Kawasaki to your average Jane and John Doe and who knows who else has suffered from that &#8211; unreadable Captcha.. its funny it says &#8221; are you human&#8221; -&gt; well, its precisely because i am human, i missed the captcha the 7th time &#8211; and hence am quitting.. Try Yahoo and even Harvard business Review blog </p>
<p>i am not joking.. or maybe you guys have some secret sauce?</p>
<p>regards<br />olga-lednichenko-shulman</p>
<p>nesher rocks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pjsherman</title>
		<link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2010/03/starbucks-email-fail-lowering-conversion-the-quick-and-easy-way/comment-page-1/#comment-9514</link>
		<dc:creator>pjsherman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 01:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usabilityblog.com/?p=660#comment-9514</guid>
		<description>It actually *is* a valid part of an email address, and some people use it so they can more efficiently manage their email. See this article for more: &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://bit.ly/bni67A&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://bit.ly/bni67A&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It actually *is* a valid part of an email address, and some people use it so they can more efficiently manage their email. See this article for more: <br /><a href="http://bit.ly/bni67A" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/bni67A</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KevBurnsJr</title>
		<link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2010/03/starbucks-email-fail-lowering-conversion-the-quick-and-easy-way/comment-page-1/#comment-9513</link>
		<dc:creator>KevBurnsJr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 00:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usabilityblog.com/?p=660#comment-9513</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s just bad validation algorithms.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here&#039;s a great validation algorithm for PHP.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dominicsayers.com/isemail&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.dominicsayers.com/isemail&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#39;s just bad validation algorithms.  </p>
<p>Here&#39;s a great validation algorithm for PHP.<br /><a href="http://www.dominicsayers.com/isemail" rel="nofollow">http://www.dominicsayers.com/isemail</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lisa</title>
		<link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2010/03/starbucks-email-fail-lowering-conversion-the-quick-and-easy-way/comment-page-1/#comment-9512</link>
		<dc:creator>lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 23:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usabilityblog.com/?p=660#comment-9512</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t completely understand this article. I&#039;ve just checked hotmail signup and the + sign isn&#039;t a valid character. So why would you allow this in a form? Is this actually a valid character in some emails?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#39;t completely understand this article. I&#39;ve just checked hotmail signup and the + sign isn&#39;t a valid character. So why would you allow this in a form? Is this actually a valid character in some emails?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck LeDuc Díaz</title>
		<link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2010/03/starbucks-email-fail-lowering-conversion-the-quick-and-easy-way/comment-page-1/#comment-9490</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck LeDuc Díaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 00:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usabilityblog.com/?p=660#comment-9490</guid>
		<description>You did! Apparently your long nights poring over RFCs have paid off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You did! Apparently your long nights poring over RFCs have paid off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pjsherman</title>
		<link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2010/03/starbucks-email-fail-lowering-conversion-the-quick-and-easy-way/comment-page-1/#comment-9488</link>
		<dc:creator>pjsherman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 22:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usabilityblog.com/?p=660#comment-9488</guid>
		<description>Wait a sec, does this mean I taught you a geek trick? Cool... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait a sec, does this mean I taught you a geek trick? Cool&#8230; :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck LeDuc Díaz</title>
		<link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2010/03/starbucks-email-fail-lowering-conversion-the-quick-and-easy-way/comment-page-1/#comment-9487</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck LeDuc Díaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usabilityblog.com/?p=660#comment-9487</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t even know about &quot;plus addressing&quot;.  Thanks for this.  And I&#039;m relieved that our sites allow it - although our own mail server rejects mail addressed as such.  Thank goodness for gmail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#39;t even know about &#8220;plus addressing&#8221;.  Thanks for this.  And I&#39;m relieved that our sites allow it &#8211; although our own mail server rejects mail addressed as such.  Thank goodness for gmail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2010/03/starbucks-email-fail-lowering-conversion-the-quick-and-easy-way/comment-page-1/#comment-9485</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usabilityblog.com/?p=660#comment-9485</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by elmook: Lowering Conversion The Quick And Easy Way http://bit.ly/bJ2Zjg #ux...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by elmook: Lowering Conversion The Quick And Easy Way <a href="http://bit.ly/bJ2Zjg" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/bJ2Zjg</a> #ux&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

